"Lawful" isn't necessarily characterized by the accepted laws of a society; rather, it refers to an adherence to a particular set of principles or a code (which can still be based upon the laws of society). Thus, as long as he doesn't compromise his principles, and his principles are dedicated to promoting good, he would probably be considered lawful good.Conversely, a chaotic good person may still have principles but would be willing to compromise them if the greater good necessitated it (stealing to feed starving people, for example).As for bond, he would probably be lawful neutral or just neutral.Also, Rorschach should probably be lawful neutral in that he adheres to a particular code which I would say isn't centered so much around good as it is dedicated to preserving society by removing those elements that endanger or compromise it./nerdiness